Abstract

ECG-gated Versus Non-ECG-gated High-pitch Dual-source CT for Whole Body CT Angiography (CTA)

posted by Julian L. Wichmann, M.D. | Aug 10, 2017

Purpose

To investigate motion artifacts, image quality, and practical differences in electrocardiographic (ECG)-gated versus non-ECGgated high-pitch dual-source computed tomography angiography (CTA) of the whole aorta.

Material and Methods

Two groups, each including 40 patients, underwent either ECG-gated or non-ECG-gated high-pitch dual-source CTA of the whole aorta. The aortic annulus, aortic valve, coronary ostia, and the presence of motion artifacts of the thoracic aorta as well as vascular contrast down to the femoral arteries were independently assessed by two readers. Additional objective parameters including image noise and signal-to-noise ratio were analyzed.

Results

Subjective and objective scoring revealed no presence of motional artifacts regardless of whether the ECG-gated or the non-ECG-gated protocol was used (P > 0.1). Image acquisition parameters (examination length, examination duration, radiation dose) were comparable between the two groups without significant differences. The aortic annulus, aortic valve, and coronary ostia were reliably evaluable in all patients. Vascular contrast was rated excellent in both groups.

Conclusions

High-pitch dual-source CTA of the whole aorta is a robust and dose-efficient examination strategy for the evaluation of aortic pathologies whether or not ECG gating is used.

 

Authors: Beeres M, Wichmann JL, Frellesen C, Bucher A, Albrecht M, Scholtz JE, Nour-Eldin NE, Gruber-Rouh T, Lee C, Vogl T, Lehnert T

Full text available at: Acad. Radiol. 2016 Feb;23(2):163-7



Follow us
  • RSS Feed

This website is for medical experts only, read more here.
© Spirit Link GmbH 2007-2017. All rights reserved.