Article Series: Dual Energy CT – Scientific Evidence and Clinical Application (5/7) – Extremities
This article is part of the seven-article series on “Dual Energy CT – Scientific Evidence and Clinical Application” and covers Dual Energy applications of the extremities comprising peripheral arteries, tendons and ligaments, gout, bone marrow edema, and metal artifact reduction.
- Contents and introduction
- Previous article: Abdominal Imaging
- Next article: Current Application in Routine Clinical Practice
Extremities
Peripheral Arteries

Figure 9 A maximum intensity projection shows multiple occlusions and collaterals in the entire vasculature of the legs.
Similar to the arteries of head and neck, it is feasible to differentiate bone and arteries in runoff angiography datasets and display the vasculature without superimposition of bones. Studies have confirmed that Dual Energy based bone removal is more reliable and faster than conventional, software based bone removal [118-122]. The resulting maximum intensity projections provide an excellent overview of the entire vasculature of abdomen, pelvis, and the entire legs in one single image. Additionally, the software implemented in Dual Source systems provides the option to add calcified plaques back into the MIP image. Thus, the plaques can be switched on and off in order to visualize both the residual lumen and the plaque burden in the area of a stenosis. These images are very helpful for communicating the angiographic findings, e.g. to vascular surgeons.
The algorithm further contains a beam hardening correction that aims to identify the interface between plaque and vessel lumen more exactly, and studies have shown that the residual lumen is quantified more precisely with this technique [123]. Further studies have confirmed the efficacy of plaque removal but also showed limitations in small diameters and low enhancement of calcified crural arteries [124]. Therefore, in our experience the combination of runoff angiography in Dual Energy technique and an additional dynamic acquisition of the lower legs with a second small bolus of contrast material provide the best option to clarify the situation in critical limb ischemia.
Tendons and Ligaments

Figure 10 Tendons of the ankle are visualized well. However, the ligaments which are of diagnostic importance are too thin to visualize with this technique.
Initial experiments had shown that tendons and ligaments can be identified in a Dual Energy dataset due to their weak spectral properties in comparison to other tissue with similar CT density [125-126]. This would be an attractive option to evaluate tendons and ligaments along with the bones, e.g. in joint evaluation after trauma. There have been some reports on successful clinical application of this technique [127-128]. However, the contrast to noise ratio is very weak, so that there is considerable noise in the surrounding tissue and the signal in the tendon itself is not always continuous, depending on the adjacent bony structures and the resulting beam hardening. Therefore, the diagnostic value in clinical practice is quite limited and certainly no competition to MRI [129].
Gout

Figure 11 Volume rendered image showing deposits of uric acid in the right index finger in blue. Contrast enhancement is color coded in red.
Initial reports had shown that it is not only possible to identify uric acid in kidney stones, but also in the soft tissue around joints as morphological substrate of gout [130]. The method proved to be very helpful in clinical practice as it confirms the diagnosis without joint fluid aspiration and additionally shows the extent of gout tophi and any affection of the adjacent joint [131-136].
Bone Marrow Edema
Bone marrow edema is a very sensitive sign for any pathological process in bones in MRI. Similarly, Dual energy CT can identify water in the bone marrow and thus identify bone bruises which are normally not visible in spongy bone in CT. Initial reports confirmed the feasibility and very good agreement with MRI [137].
Metal Artifact Reduction
![]() |
![]() |
Figure 12 Normal (left) and high energy monoenergetic reconstruction (right) showing that metal artifacts can be reduced significantly.
Metal artifacts pose a significant problem in clinical CT. Especially after implantation of any metallic prostheses or other hardware, the implant itself, the interface between implant and bone, and the surrounding tissue are most important to exclude a fracture of the hardware, loosening, infection, or hematoma. However, metal artifacts severely impair image quality, often rendering it impossible to answer the relevant diagnostic questions.
Metal artifacts consist of photon starvation and beam hardening. The former results in lack of transmission and can only be reduced by increasing the energy and amount of photons. The latter can be corrected based on Dual Energy information, because there is a difference in beam hardening between the low and high energy acquisition; thus it is feasible to extrapolate an image with the beam hardening properties at very high photon energies. Initial own studies confirmed that a significant reduction of metal artifacts is feasible with this technique. In contrast to other Dual Energy protocols, we applied a higher current on the filtered high energy tube in order to increase the share of high energy photons [138]. Further research will be required to determine the optimal tube current relation.
References
118. Sommer WH, Brockmann C. Vascular System: Peripheral Arteries. In: Johnson TRC, Fink C, Schönberg SO, Reiser MF, eds. Dual Energy CT in Clinical Practice. Heidelberg: Springer, 2010:67-72.
119. Yamamoto S, McWilliams J, Arellano C, Marfori W, Cheng W, McNamara T, Quinones-Baldrich WJ, Ruehm SG. Dual-energy CT angiography of pelvic and lower extremity arteries: dual-energy bone subtraction versus manual bone subtraction. Clin Radiol 2009;64:1088-1096.
120. Sommer WH, Johnson TR, Becker CR, Arnoldi E, Kramer H, Reiser MF, Nikolaou K. The value of dual-energy bone removal in maximum intensity projections of lower extremity computed tomography angiography. Invest Radiol 2009;44:285-292.
121. Brockmann C, Jochum S, Sadick M, Huck K, Ziegler P, Fink C, Schoenberg SO, Diehl SJ. Dual-energy CT angiography in peripheral arterial occlusive disease. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2009;32:630-637.
122. Meyer BC, Werncke T, Hopfenmuller W, Raatschen HJ, Wolf KJ, Albrecht T. Dual energy CT of peripheral arteries: effect of automatic bone and plaque removal on image quality and grading of stenoses. Eur J Radiol 2008;68:414-422.
123. Thomas C, Korn A, Ketelsen D, Danz S, Tsifikas I, Claussen CD, Ernemann U, Heuschmid M. Automatic lumen segmentation in calcified plaques: dual-energy CT versus standard reconstructions in comparison with digital subtraction angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010;194:1590-1595.
124. Werncke T, Albrecht T, Wolf KJ, Meyer BC. [Dual energy CT of the peripheral arteries: a phantom study to assess the effect of automatic plaque removal on stenosis grading]. Rofo 2010;182:682-689.
125. Johnson TR, Krauss B, Sedlmair M, Grasruck M, Bruder H, Morhard D, Fink C, Weckbach S, Lenhard M, Schmidt B, et al. Material differentiation by dual energy CT: initial experience. Eur Radiol 2007;17:1510-1517.
126. Jochum S. Extremities: Tendons and Ligaments. In: Johnson TRC, Fink C, Schönberg SO, Reiser MF, eds. Dual Energy CT in Clinical Practice. Heidelberg: Springer, 2010:193-198.
127. Deng K, Sun C, Liu C, Ma R. Initial experience with visualizing hand and foot tendons by dual-energy computed tomography. Clin Imaging 2009;33:384-389.
128. Sun C, Miao F, Wang XM, Wang T, Ma R, Wang DP, Liu C. An initial qualitative study of dual-energy CT in the knee ligaments. Surg Radiol Anat 2008;30:443-447.
129. Lohan DG, Motamedi K, Chow K, Habibi R, Panknin C, Ruehm SG, Seeger LL. Does dual-energy CT of lower-extremity tendons incur penalties in patient radiation exposure or reduced multiplanar reconstruction image quality? AJR Am J Roentgenol 2008;191:1386-1390.
130. Johnson TR, Weckbach S, Kellner H, Reiser MF, Becker CR. Clinical image: Dual-energy computed tomographic molecular imaging of gout. Arthritis Rheum 2007;56:2809.
131. Nicolaou S, Co SJ, Hou DJ. Extremities: Gout In: Johnson TRC, Fink C, Schönberg SO, Reiser MF, eds. Dual Energy CT in Clinical Practice. Heidelberg: Springer, 2010:199-214.
132. Nicolaou S, Yong-Hing CJ, Galea-Soler S, Hou DJ, Louis L, Munk P. Dual-energy CT as a potential new diagnostic tool in the management of gout in the acute setting. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010;194:1072-1078.
133. Artmann A, Ratzenbock M, Noszian I, Trieb K. [Dual energy CT--a new perspective in the diagnosis of gout]. Rofo 2010;182:261-266.
134. Parikh P, Butendieck R, Kransdorf M, Calamia K. Detection of lumbar facet joint gouty arthritis using dual-energy computed tomography. J Rheumatol 2010;37:2190-2191.
135. Choi HK, Al-Arfaj AM, Eftekhari A, Munk PL, Shojania K, Reid G, Nicolaou S. Dual energy computed tomography in tophaceous gout. Ann Rheum Dis 2009;68:1609-1612.
136. Bacani AK, McCollough CH, Glazebrook KN, Bond JR, Michet CJ, Milks J, Manek NJ. Dual energy computed tomography for quantification of tissue urate deposits in tophaceous gout: help from modern physics in the management of an ancient disease. Rheumatol Int 2009
137. Pache G, Krauss B, Strohm P, Saueressig U, Blanke P, Bulla S, Schafer O, Helwig P, Kotter E, Langer M, Baumann T. Dual-energy CT virtual noncalcium technique: detecting posttraumatic bone marrow lesions–feasibility study. Radiology 2010;256:617-624.
138. Bamberg F, Dierks A, Nikolaou K, Reiser MF, Becker CR, Johnson TRC. Metal Artifact Reduction by Dual Energy Computed Tomography Using Monoenergetic Extrapolation. Eur Radiol 2010 in press.







